When choosing between the Perodua Ativa and Proton X50, fuel consumption is an important factor, especially for buyers seeking to minimize running costs. Below is a comparison of the fuel efficiency of these two popular compact SUVs.
| Criteria | Perodua Ativa | Proton X50 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 1.0L Turbocharged, 3-cylinder | 1.5L Turbocharged, 3-cylinder (Standard, Executive, Premium) 1.5L TGDi (Flagship) |
| Fuel Consumption (km/L) | 18.9 km/L | 15.4 km/L (1.5L turbo) 12.4 km/L (1.5L TGDi) |
| Fuel Type | Petrol (RON 95) | Petrol (RON 95) |
| Power Output | 98 hp | 148 hp (1.5L turbo)177 hp (1.5L TGDi) |
| Driving Focus | Efficiency and affordability for city driving | More power, better for highway and performance |
| Best For | Drivers prioritizing low fuel consumption and budget-friendly city commuting | Drivers seeking a sportier drive with more power but willing to compromise on fuel efficiency |
| Vehicle Weight | Approx. 1,035 kg | Approx. 1,370 kg |
Summary:
- Perodua Ativa: The Ativa offers excellent fuel efficiency at 18.9 km/L, making it a better option for daily commuting and long-term savings on fuel. Its 1.0L engine is designed for urban drivers who prioritize low running costs.
- Proton X50: With a more powerful 1.5L engine, the X50 provides greater performance but consumes more fuel, ranging from 15.4 km/L for the standard 1.5L turbo engine to 12.4 km/L for the 1.5L TGDi engine. This is ideal for drivers looking for more power and a dynamic driving experience, but who can accept higher fuel consumption.
Both SUVs offer unique advantages, but if fuel efficiency is your priority, the Perodua Ativa stands out as the more economical choice.
