Perodua Ativa Fuel Economy – Drive More, Spend Less
The Perodua Ativa is one of Malaysia’s most popular compact SUVs, and one of the biggest reasons is its impressive fuel economy. Equipped with a 1.0L turbocharged engine and CVT transmission, the Ativa is designed to deliver powerful performance while keeping fuel consumption low. On average, the Ativa offers around 18–20 km per litre, making it one of the most fuel-efficient SUVs in its class.
For daily city driving or long highway journeys, the Ativa helps drivers save more at the pump without sacrificing comfort and safety. With rising fuel prices, this makes the Ativa a smart choice for families, young professionals, and anyone who values efficiency.
Beyond fuel savings, the Ativa also comes with advanced safety features under Perodua Smart Drive Assist (PSDA), spacious interior, and stylish design – proving that you don’t need to compromise style or performance to enjoy great fuel economy.
In short: the Perodua Ativa is not just about driving – it’s about driving smarter, safer, and more economically.
Fuel Economy Showdown: Perodua Ativa vs Proton X50 vs Honda WR-V
1. Perodua Ativa
Perodua officially lists the Ativa’s fuel consumption ranging from 5.29 L/100 km (most efficient) to 7.5 L/100 km, depending on driving style and variant.
This translates to roughly 13.3–18.9 km per litre—making the Ativa an exceptionally economical compact SUV for city and highway use.
2. Proton X50
- Official (combined cycle):
- Earlier 1.5T (PFI) variants claim 6.5 L/100 km (~15.4 km/L), while the 1.5 TGDi Flagship claims 6.4 L/100 km (~15.6 km/L).
- 2025 Facelift Improvement:
- The new four-cylinder BHE15-EFZ engine improves fuel efficiency by about 4.7 %, with a new claim of around 6.1 L/100 km (~16.4 km/L).
- Real-world Figures:
- Owner-reported averages fall closer to 10.0 km/L (10 L/100 km) on platforms
- One comment from r/kereta reflects city driving stats around 11.7 L/100 km
3. Honda WR-V
Honda Malaysia states the WR-V achieves a combined fuel consumption of 6.0 L/100 km, equating to approximately 16.7 km/L.
Comparative Table
| Model | Official Fuel Use | Claimed km/L | Real-World Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perodua Ativa | 5.29–7.5 L/100 km | ~13–19 km/L | Matches official claims |
| Proton X50 | 6.4–6.5 L/100 km (old) ~6.1 L/100 km (2025 facelift) | ~15.4–16.4 km/L | ~9–10 km/L in practice |
| Honda WR-V | ~6.0 L/100 km | ~16.7 km/L | Likely close to claim |
Key Observations
- Best Efficiency: The Perodua Ativa leads the pack with the lowest official fuel consumption and a high km/L rate—ideal for savings-focused drivers.
- Power vs Efficiency: The Proton X50’s more powerful engine gives better performance, especially in the 2025 facelift, but real-world fuel economy tends to be less favorable compared to its official claim.
- Balanced Choice: The Honda WR-V offers a middle ground—efficient, dependable, and delivering solid real-world results close to claimed figures.
Community Insights
A Reddit user put it succinctly:
“The Ativa shines here with a fuel consumption rate of about 18.9 km/L… The X50 has more power, but is less fuel-efficient (around 15.4 km/L)”
Conclusion
If fuel efficiency is your top priority—especially for city commuting—the Perodua Ativa stands out as the most economical choice. The Honda WR-V offers a solid compromise between economy and reliability. Meanwhile, the Proton X50 brings power and premium feel but tends to have higher fuel usage in real-world driving despite improvements in the 2025 facelift.
